# barr_SignifLU

BarrSignif:
Temporary, but presently prevents introgression or ingress of competing species


BarrSignif:
Confines population to small area of usable habitat


BarrSignif:
Limits or precludes opportunity for population re-founding


BarrSignif:
Limits expression of life history characteristics


# BARRIER

Comment:
Labeled as S Fk Little Joe Cr on data sheet???


# FISHPRES

Comments:
*Changed to potentially hybridized from introgressed 75-89% due to no testing in stream


Comments:
*Did not change stgeneticsid call - used more recent sample.


Comments:
*Changed stgeneticsid pop from introgressed 90-99% based on genetic data


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid from introgressed 90-99% since all 3 samples are pure


Comments:
*stgenetics call ok - based on newest sample


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - new sample not in database


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from potentially hybridized based on sample


Comments:
*changed from potentially altered due to downstream pure populations


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - based on introgressed sample


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid call from introgressed based on genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid ok based on new sample not in database


Comments:
* ok stgeneticsid call based on new genetic sample


Comments:
*changed from introgressed based on genetic sample


Comments:
* stgeneticsid ok based on introgressed sample


Comments:
*Changed to introgressed 90-99% due to data entry error.


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from suspected unaltered due to genetic sample


Comments:
* changed from introgressed 90-99% due to genetic sample


Comments:
*Changed to introgressed 90-99% based on two conflicting genetic samples with small sizes - averaged the two.


Comments:
*Changed to genetically pure due to genetic sample


Comments:
*Not changed due to genetic samples showing introgression.


Comments:
*No change due to genetic sample showing introgression


Comments:
*Genetic call ok - samples 99 or greater


Comments:
*Changed to introgressed 90-99% due to genetic sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid call from suspected unaltered based on genetic sample


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - based on average of genetic samples


Comments:
* stgenetics call ok - see note on genetic samples


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid call from introgressed 90-99% based on genetic sample


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok based on 2 samples


Comments:
*stgeneticsid ok due to questionable sample size in genetic samples


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call is ok based on 3 samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - average of 2 samples


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok based on 3 genetic samples


Comments:
*Did not changed - used median of genetic samples


Comments:
stgeneticsid based on 2002 genetic sample - not in database


Comments:
*Changed stgeneticsid call to from suspected hydridized based on genetics sample


Comments:
*changed from potentially hybridized due to genetic sample


Comments:
*ok did not change stgeneticsid - used average of samples


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - based on average of samples


Comments:
*stgenetics call based on new genetics sample not in database


Comments:
*Ok - used the average of 2 samples = 90%


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - based on 2 genetic samples


Comments:
*Changed to tested 90-99% due to genetic sample


Comments:
*Averaged genetic samples - small sample size


Comments:
*stgenetics call ok - samples reflect downstream hybridization gradient


Comments:
Changed to introgressed 90-99% due to genetic sample


Comments:
*Changed to genetically unaltered based on genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok based on 2 genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call changed from introgressed 75-89% due to new sample 2002 not in database


Comments:
* checked genetic sample data with MTFWP - poor data quality so changed call from introgressed tested.


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid from suspected unaltered based on genetic sample


Comments:
*Corrected data entry error in stgeneticsid


Comments:
*Two samples one 100% in 1994 and one 87.2 in 1995 sample sizes similar and in similar locations - changed to Introgressed 75-89%


Comments:
*Changed to introgressed 90-99% based on genetic samples


Comments:
New genetics collected 2002 - suspected hybridized


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok based on 2 samples


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid from suspected unaltered based on genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call based on age of genetic sample


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call based on new sample upstream of east fork


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from introgressed 90-99% due to old sample size


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call is ok based on 4 genetic samples


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid from introgressed 75-89% due to genetic sample


Comments:
* stgeneticsid ok based on newer genetic sample


Comments:
* stgeneticsid ok based on average of sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from genetically unaltered based on genetic sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from introgressed 75-89% based on genetic sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from suspected unaltered based on genetic sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid call from potentially hybridized based on genetic sample


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - based on several genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid is ok - based on 2 genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - biologists reviewed all genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok based on 3 samples


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - biologists reviewed all data samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - used most current data


Comments:
*stgenetics call ok - based on genetic sample


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - some contaimination from lake


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - based on 3 genetic samples


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid call from introgressed less than 75% based on genetic sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid call from introgressed less than 75% based on 3 genetic samples


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from introgressed less than 75% based on genetic samples


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid from introgressed 90-99% based on genetic samples and data entry error


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - based on 2 genetic samples


Comments:
* genetic sample is dated and probably does not reflect current situation


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid from potentially hybridized based on genetic sample


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid from potentially hybridized based on genetic sample on Tunnel Cr.


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - averaged 2 samples


Comments:
*stgeneticsid ok based on genetic sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid call from genetically unaltered due to no genetic sample and connection to Yak River.


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - see genetic sample


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid from introgressed less than 75% due to ambiguity between genetic samples


Comments:
* changed stgeneticsid call from introgressed less than 75% due to ambiguity in genetic samples


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid call to genetically unaltered based on genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid ok - based on genetic sample of 80%


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - genetic sample belongs to upper part of mount cr.  Stream miles wrong on genetic sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from potentially hybridized based on genetic sample


Comments:
*stgenetics call ok based on 2 genetic samples


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid call from genetically unaltered to suspected unaltered based on location of genetic sample


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok based on both genetic samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok due based on average of samples


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok due to the questionable nature of genetics sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid  call from suspected unaltered based on location of genetic sample


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - appears to be an average of the samples


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from genetically unaltered based on lack of genetic data


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - based on more introgressed sample


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from introgressed less than 75% due to genetic tests are not in this section


Comments:
*stgeneticsid call ok - based on genetic samples


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid from introgressed 90-99% based on old sample but no other data.


Comments:
*stgenetics call ok - made barrier and upper and lower bounds accommodate genetic sample


Comments:
*changed barrier location .3 miles lower to match genetic sample locations


Comments:
* stgeneticsid call ok - fish from lakes contaminating - location of 100% genetic sample at 14.59 may not be accurate


Comments:
*changed by dividing blackfoot r. above landers fork to headwaters as separate reach with genetic data


Comments:
*changed stgeneticsid call from genetically unaltered based on genetic sample


Comments:
*stgeneticsid ok based on newer genetic testing


# FishPresGeneticsLU

GeneticsDesc:
Genetically unaltered (>99.0%) - tested via electrophoresis or DNA


GeneticsDesc:
Introgressed (hybridized) - tested and found to be 90% to 99% WSCT


GeneticsDesc:
Introgressed (hybridized) - tested and found to be 75% to 89% WSCT


GeneticsDesc:
Introgressed (hybridized) - tested and found to be less than 75% WSCT


GeneticsDesc:
Suspected unaltered with no record of stocking or contaminating species present


GeneticsDesc:
Potentially hybridized with records of contaminating species being stocked or occurring in stream


GeneticsDesc:
Hybridized and Pure populations co-exist in stream (use only if reproductive isolation is suspected and testing completed)


# HistoricalLU

Description:
Habitat limited - gradient, elevation, temperature


Description:
Known geologic barrier at lower boundary


# HUCBasinLU

Basin Name:
Kuskokwim Bay-Nunivak Island-St. Matthew Island


# Risk Cons Pop Qualifier LU

ConsPop Qualifier:
Core Conservation Population (must be genetically unaltered - greater than 99% pure)


ConsPop Qualifier:
Known or Probable Unique Life History (fluvial, ad-fluvial, or resident)


ConsPop Qualifier:
Known or Probable Ecological Adaptation to extreme environmental condition


ConsPop Qualifier:
Known or Probable Predisposition for large size or unique coloration


ConsPop Qualifier:
Other - Population occupies habitat that is likely to become part of the WSCT conservation focus


# Risk Genetic Risk LU

Activity:
Hybridizing species CANNOT INTERACT with existing WSCT population.  Barrier provides complete blockage to upstream fish movement.  Native hybridizing species may be present in connected system.


Activity:
Hybridizing species are in same stream and/or drainage FURTHER THAN 10 KM from WSCT population, but not in same stream segment as WSCT, or WITHIN 10 KM WHERE BARRIER EXISTS, BUT MAY BE AT RISK OF FAILUREE.


Activity:
Hybridizing species are in same stream and/or drainage WITHIN 10 KM of WSCT population and NO BARRIER EXISTS; however, hybridizing species not yet found in same stream segment as WSCT Population.  Native hybridizing species (resident or anadromous redband


Activity:
Introduced hybridizing species are SYMPATRIC with WSCT population in same stream segment.


# RISK Isolation Risk LU

Criteria:
Migratory forms must be present and migration corridors are open (connectivity maintained).


Criteria:
Migratory forms are present, but connection with other migratory populations disrupted at a frequency that allows only occasional spawning.


Criteria:
Questionable whether migratory form exists within connected habitat; however, possible infrequent straying of adults from other populations into area occupied by population.


Criteria:
Population is isolated from any other population segment, usually due to barrier, but may be related to lack of movement or distance to nearest population.


# Risk Management Activities LU

Activity:
Hydroelectric, water storage, and/or flood control


# RISK Pop Demograph Risk LU

Criteria:
Population is increasing or fluctuating around an equalibrium that fills available habitat that is near potential. No nonnative competing or predating species present.


Criteria:
Population has been reduced from potential, but fluctuating around an equalibrium (population relatively stable and either habitat quality is less than potential, or another factor - disease, competition, etc. - is limiting the population).


Criteria:
Population has been reduced and is declining (year-class failures are periodic; competition may be reducing survival; habitat limiting population).


Criteria:
Population has been much reduced and has either been declining over a long time period or has been declining at a fast rate over a short time-period (year-class failures are common; competition or habitat dramatically reducing survival).


# Risk Restoration Efforts LU

WorkTypeText:
Physical removal of competing/hybridizing species


WorkTypeText:
Chemical removal of competing/hybridizing species


WorkTypeText:
Land-use mitigation direction and requirements


WorkTypeText:
Watershed under protective mgt (Nat'l Park, wilder


# RISK_ASSESSMENT

Comments:
*changed cons. Qualifer to 2 due to genetic samples


Comments:
2 small resorvoirs for additional habitat


Comments:
private pond stocking and other subdivision development


Comments:
BOR-Evaluation of Milk River Irragation Project


Comments:
*Changed conservation qualifier to other - due to genetics


Comments:
population introduction using eggs from prickly pear creek


Comments:
*Changed conservation qualifier to other due to genetic sample


Comments:
*Changed conservation qualifier to 5 - some introgressed


Comments:
Bull trout, sculpin, dace (ask Steve whether he saw EBT)


Comments:
whitefish, longnose suckers, slimy sculpin; mine reclamation


Comments:
water treatment for municipal water supply


Comments:
Other cutthroat trout species - Yellowstone cutthroat trout; Other Restoration Activity - Road removal on Deer Creek


Comments:
Other cutthroat trout species - Yellowstone cutthroat trout


Comments:
Other Restroation Activities - Mining rehabilitation (tarbox, keystone), Road Obliteration


Comments:
Yellowstone in headwaters lakes: Stocking in pony lake


Comments:
Questionable lifespan of barrier, development and private fish ponds.


Comments:
Perch and Kokanee; Recreation development


Comments:
Arctic grayling and yellowstone cutthroat


Comments:
Hydro dam for Spotted Bear RD. with natural waterfall 0.25 mile upstream.


Comments:
Other Fish: Bass, Pike, Lake Whitefish, Perch


Comments:
Lk. Trout rare; Other fish: Sculpins and Whitefish


Comments:
Kokanee,Chinook,LMB,NPike,SMB,Yellow Perch, Crappie          Land Use Activity= agriculutral


Comments:
Nez Perce screw traps, hatchery satelite,rearing adult traps


Comments:
Other cutthroat trout: Yellowstone, Other trout: Rainbow, Other restoration: road obliteration


Comments:
Other restoration activities: road obliteration/partial obliteration


Comments:
Other trout: Bull, Other fish: MWF, LNS, CSU, Dace, Sculpin


Comments:
Bull trout, Change from rainbow stocking to cutthroat stocking in Nevada reservoir


Comments:
Northern Pike, Brook Stickleback, Yellow Perch, Pumpkinseed


Comments:
Northern Pike,  Yellow Perch, Pumpkinseed


Comments:
Other fish: yellow perch, pumpkinseed, LM bass


Comments:
Other impacts: unscreened irrigation ditch


Comments:
Other fish: large scale and long nose suckers, dace, and sculpin Other restoration: This drainage has high potential to greatly increase WSCT status by improving irrigation and grazing management.


# RiskSignificantDisease LU

Disease Risk:
Significant diseases and the pathogens that cause these diseases have very limited opportunity to interact with existing WSCT population.  Significant disease and pathogens are not known to exist in stream or watershed associated with WSCT population.


Disease Risk:
Significant diseases and/or pathogens have been introduced and/or identified in stream and/or drainage further than 10 km from WSCT population, but not in same stream segment as WSCT, or within 10 km where existing barriers exist, but may be at risk of fa


Disease Risk:
Significant diseases and/or pathogens have been introduced and/or have been identified in same stream and/or drainage within 10km of WSCT population and no barriers exist between disease and/or pathogens and diseased fish species and WSCT population.


Disease Risk:
Significant disease and/or pathogens and disease carrying species are sympatric with WSCT in same stream segment.


Disease Risk:
WSCT population is known to be positive for significant disease and/or pathogens are present.  WSCT population has a history of impacts from significant disease.  Environmental and/or biological condition may have intensified disease effects.


